Assessing concussion rules

I see that the A-League has adopted permanent concussion substitutes, and I’m realizing there may be confusion about when to stop play for suspected head injuries, especially per Law 5/3. Complaints often arise when players are left down. I could explain when referees typically stop play, the related controversies, and suggest how to enhance clarity. I should also identify which match the user is referring to and provide options like a summary or an explainer. Lastly, I’ll reply in Chinese with the relevant rules.Requesting match details

I realize that I can pull quotes if I have browsing capability, but I should only ask for that when it's absolutely necessary. It seems better to directly ask the user for match details instead. This way, I avoid potentially unnecessary requests while still aiming to provide useful information. I’ll keep my question focused and clear to get the information needed efficiently. Let’s see what specific details the user can share!Crafting a clear response

I need to acknowledge the quote first and explain that according to IFAB Laws 5 and 3, referees must stop play immediately for head injuries, while other injuries typically wait until the ball is out of play, with some exceptions. The A-League has its own rules, using permanent concussion substitutions and independent doctors, but no temporary concussion subs.

I should ask the user for match details, like "Which match? What time?" so I can provide objective feedback. Lastly, I can offer a short template for a social post from a coach's perspective, but it’s not necessary.

看起来这是在吐槽裁判“该吹停不吹停”。给你一个快速科普，方便判断这事到底在规则上站不站得住：

• 裁判依据的是IFAB比赛规则（澳超并没有另起一套）。对“疑似头部受伤/脑震荡”，应立即停止比赛；其他受伤通常等到下一次死球才停。
• 例外会立刻停：门将受伤、严重伤病、同队两人相撞等；轻微抽筋或战术性倒地，裁判一般会让比赛继续。
• 脑震荡方面：澳超采用“额外换人名额”的永久脑震荡换人（非临时），但是否停赛场仍取决于当下是否被判断为疑似脑震荡。
• VAR不“吹停”比赛，只能在下一次死球介入；现场是否先停，权力在主裁。

所以，如果当时倒地的是疑似头部受伤却没停，那确实不符合规则精神；若是其他受伤，多数情况下裁判让攻势继续是合规的。

要不要把具体比赛、时间点告诉我？我可以对照规则条文帮你复盘该不该停、有哪些判例可参考。也可以：

1. 查教练原话与赛后判罚报告（若有）
2. 提炼一段客观赛评/社媒短评
3. 给出相关规则要点的中英对照摘录